As the 1-bromohexane is primary and the nucleophile a strong unhindered base, the reaction should be a SN2 reaction. However, the solvent $\ce{EtOH}$ is a polar protic solvent which favours SN1/E1 reactions. In addition, the temperature of the reaction is quite high and high temperatures favour the formation of elimination reactions, thus the reaction should be E1. But an E1 doesn't require a strong base, or else an E2 reaction would take place at the beginning. So does that make this reaction an E2 reaction? Am I thinking correctly on how to consider all the different parts of the reaction?
1 Answer
$\begingroup$
$\endgroup$
3
$\ce{EtO-}$ is a strong base, as well as a strong nucleophile, and the temperature is not too high. Therefore a mixture of products is most likely to be formed, where substitution will lead to the major and elimination will lead to the minor product.
Also, the reactant is a primary halide. So, in substitution, SN2 will be favoured, whereas in elimination E2 will be favoured.
So, final product will be,
- Ethoxy hexane (via SN2) (major)
- Hex-1-ene (via E2) (minor). (Maybe, a very little amount of hex-2-ene may also form by very very small fraction of E1).
-
$\begingroup$ Why is Sn2 major? I'm having difficult time understanding how a polar protic solvent can result in a Sn2 reaction. Isn't elimination reactions favoured in polar protic solvents? $\endgroup$– J.SeCommented Feb 12, 2018 at 20:51
-
1$\begingroup$ @J.Se take a look at this, will try to post a bit more detailed explanation. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 13, 2018 at 0:44
-
$\begingroup$ As a general rule, carbocations do not form in the presence of strong bases. This means that $\ce{S_N1}$ or $\ce{E1}$ mechanisms are ruled out immediately. It is important to look at all of the factors that are at play in the reaction: the alkyl halide, the nucleophile/base, the solvent and the temperature. It is the cumulative effect of these that determines the major product, not any one of them alone. $\endgroup$ Commented May 8, 2019 at 14:55