Timeline for Reasons for solid or liquid soap
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
21 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 22, 2020 at 15:18 | comment | added | user96138 | chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/82008/… | |
Jun 29, 2020 at 8:58 | vote | accept | Sam | ||
Jun 27, 2020 at 12:59 | answer | added | James Gaidis | timeline score: 1 | |
Jun 27, 2020 at 11:05 | answer | added | D Arora | timeline score: 8 | |
Sep 1, 2017 at 18:41 | history | edited | Sam | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
Sep 1, 2017 at 15:57 | history | reopened |
Mithoron Jon Custer Tyberius♦ Sam ringo |
||
Sep 1, 2017 at 14:28 | comment | added | Mithoron | If it was reposting then situation would be obvious, if it was asking about the same problem then still one of questions should be closed (think Occam's Razor), but this case seems tricky. | |
Sep 1, 2017 at 13:48 | comment | added | Sam | @Mithoron Let me express a well-meant criticism: If a question superficially looks like a duplicate, you should still take the time to check whether it is actually a simple duplicate of a lazy questioner, or whether it is a re-issue of an unanswered problem. I hope, that you can agree with this. | |
Sep 1, 2017 at 13:42 | review | Reopen votes | |||
Sep 1, 2017 at 15:57 | |||||
Sep 1, 2017 at 13:27 | comment | added | Mithoron | I think it only superficially looked like duplicate, and may get reopened. | |
Sep 1, 2017 at 13:25 | comment | added | Mithoron | You can't ping them like this chemistry.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3889/… | |
Sep 1, 2017 at 13:15 | comment | added | Sam | @Mithoron Although this is a duplicate of the given question, it would be very useful not to close this question. The thread 'Hard' soap vs 'Soft' soap: Why do they work this way? was already answered and has been marked as solved, even though the given answer is not meaningful. With my question I want to go into the phenomenon more closely. By your mark, other chemists can no longer answer and so the question will not be solved again. | |
Sep 1, 2017 at 9:56 | history | closed |
Mithoron andselisk♦ ron airhuff Jan |
Duplicate of 'Hard' soap vs. 'Soft' soap: Why do they work this way? | |
Aug 31, 2017 at 23:59 | answer | added | alphonse | timeline score: 1 | |
Aug 31, 2017 at 23:01 | comment | added | Karl | Well, most fats are wild mixtures of glycol triesters, so after saponification you have a dozen or so different carboxylate salts in your pot. | |
Aug 31, 2017 at 22:07 | comment | added | Sam | @Karl I thought so myself, that's why I reposted the question and am also asking for a better and more detailed answer. Could you explain, what you mean be crude mixture? | |
Aug 31, 2017 at 21:41 | comment | added | Karl | The answer to that older question is total nonsense. Reactivity of the metal has nothing to do with the physical properties of the finished product. Afaik the reason is mostly that potassium soaps are rather crude mixtures, and further the slightly larger ion seems to not fit well into any viable crystal structure of the carboxylate salt. | |
Aug 31, 2017 at 21:12 | history | edited | Sam | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 765 characters in body
|
Aug 31, 2017 at 21:06 | review | Close votes | |||
Sep 1, 2017 at 9:56 | |||||
Aug 31, 2017 at 20:47 | comment | added | Mithoron | related chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/19663/soap-versus-shampoo | |
Aug 31, 2017 at 20:29 | history | asked | Sam | CC BY-SA 3.0 |