4 added 3 characters in body; edited title
source | link

Why is it wrong to use the concept of "hybridization" while studyinghybridization for transition metal complexes?

I have asked a lot of questions on coordination chemistry here before and I have gone through a lot others here as well. Students, including me, attempt to answer those questions using the concept of hybridization because that's what we are taught in class and of course it's more easier and more intuitive than crystal field theory/molecular orbital theory. But almost all of the times that I attempted to use the concept of hybridization to explain bonding, somebody comes up and tells that itsit's wrong.

How do you determine the hybridisation state of a coordinate complex?

This is a link to one such question and the first thing that the person who answered it says-"Again: "Again, I feel a bit like a broken record. You should not use hybridization to describe transition metal complexes."

I need to know:

  • Why is it wrong? Is it wrong because itsit's oversimplified?
  • Why does it work well while explaining bonding in other compounds?
  • What goes wrong in the case of transition metals?

Why is it wrong to use the concept of "hybridization" while studying complexes?

I have asked a lot of questions on coordination chemistry here before and I have gone through a lot others here as well. Students, including me, attempt to answer those questions using the concept of hybridization because that's what we are taught in class and of course it's more easier and intuitive than crystal field theory/molecular orbital theory. But almost all of the times that I attempted to use the concept of hybridization to explain bonding, somebody comes up and tells that its wrong.

How do you determine the hybridisation state of a coordinate complex?

This is a link to one such question and the first thing that the person who answered it says-"Again, I feel a bit like a broken record. You should not use hybridization to describe transition metal complexes."

I need to know:

  • Why is it wrong? Is it wrong because its oversimplified?
  • Why does it work well while explaining bonding in other compounds?
  • What goes wrong in the case of transition metals?

Why is it wrong to use the concept of hybridization for transition metal complexes?

I have asked a lot of questions on coordination chemistry here before and I have gone through a lot others here as well. Students, including me, attempt to answer those questions using the concept of hybridization because that's what we are taught in class and of course it's easier and more intuitive than crystal field theory/molecular orbital theory. But almost all of the times that I attempted to use the concept of hybridization to explain bonding, somebody comes up and tells that it's wrong.

How do you determine the hybridisation state of a coordinate complex?

This is a link to one such question and the first thing that the person who answered it says: "Again, I feel a bit like a broken record. You should not use hybridization to describe transition metal complexes."

I need to know:

  • Why is it wrong? Is it wrong because it's oversimplified?
  • Why does it work well while explaining bonding in other compounds?
  • What goes wrong in the case of transition metals?
    Notice removed Draw attention by Loong
    Bounty Ended with orthocresol's answer chosen by Loong
    Notice added Draw attention by Loong
    Bounty Started worth 50 reputation by Loong
    Tweeted twitter.com/StackChemistry/status/878876076679811074
3 edited tags
| link
2 The aesthetics of this question was improved
source | link

I have asked a lot of questions on coordination chemistry here before and I have gone through a lot others here as well. Students, including me, attempt to answer those questions using the concept of hybridisationhybridization because that's what we are taught in class and of course it's more easier and intuitive than crystal field theory/molecular orbital theory. But almost all of the times that I attempted to use the concept of hybrisationhybridization to explain bonding, somebody comes up and tells that its wrong.

How do you determine the hybridisation state of a coordinate complex?How do you determine the hybridisation state of a coordinate complex?

This is a link to one such question and the first thing that the person who answered it says-"Again, I feel a bit like a broken record. You should not use hybridisationhybridization to describe transition metal complexes."

I need to know why is it wrong? Is it wrong because its oversimplified? Why does it work well while explaining bonding in other compounds, what goes wrong in the case of transition metals?:

  • Why is it wrong? Is it wrong because its oversimplified?
  • Why does it work well while explaining bonding in other compounds?
  • What goes wrong in the case of transition metals?

I have asked a lot of questions on coordination chemistry here before and I have gone through a lot others here as well. Students, including me, attempt to answer those questions using the concept of hybridisation because that's what we are taught in class and of course it's more easier and intuitive than crystal field theory/molecular orbital theory. But almost all of the times that I attempted to use the concept of hybrisation to explain bonding, somebody comes up and tells that its wrong.

How do you determine the hybridisation state of a coordinate complex?

This is a link to one such question and the first thing that the person who answered it says-"Again, I feel a bit like a broken record. You should not use hybridisation to describe transition metal complexes."

I need to know why is it wrong? Is it wrong because its oversimplified? Why does it work well while explaining bonding in other compounds, what goes wrong in the case of transition metals?

I have asked a lot of questions on coordination chemistry here before and I have gone through a lot others here as well. Students, including me, attempt to answer those questions using the concept of hybridization because that's what we are taught in class and of course it's more easier and intuitive than crystal field theory/molecular orbital theory. But almost all of the times that I attempted to use the concept of hybridization to explain bonding, somebody comes up and tells that its wrong.

How do you determine the hybridisation state of a coordinate complex?

This is a link to one such question and the first thing that the person who answered it says-"Again, I feel a bit like a broken record. You should not use hybridization to describe transition metal complexes."

I need to know:

  • Why is it wrong? Is it wrong because its oversimplified?
  • Why does it work well while explaining bonding in other compounds?
  • What goes wrong in the case of transition metals?
1
source | link