Timeline for Enantiomer or not?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2017 at 13:26 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackChemistry/status/832944323138318343 | ||
| Feb 18, 2017 at 11:46 | answer | added | Abhishek Mhatre | timeline score: 1 | |
| Feb 18, 2017 at 11:41 | comment | added | Black Jack 21 | this compound shows enantiomerism or this compound is an enantiomer(of what?) ? | |
| Feb 18, 2017 at 11:36 | comment | added | user7951 | Related (if you want to name this compound): What does lowercase r-s notation mean? | |
| Feb 18, 2017 at 11:04 | answer | added | Oscar Lanzi | timeline score: 1 | |
| Feb 17, 2017 at 12:37 | comment | added | Mitchell | The necessary and sufficient condition for enantiomerism is the chirality or dissymmetry of the molecule as a whole. Presence of chiral carbons isnt a guaranty that the molecule will exhibit enantiomerism. The image must not be super-imposable. This molecule shouldn't show enantiomerism because the image of the molecule looks superimposable to me. | |
| Feb 17, 2017 at 3:55 | comment | added | ron | "it has a plane of symmetry and has no chiral carbons" you're exactly right | |
| Feb 17, 2017 at 2:33 | history | asked | Pepria | CC BY-SA 3.0 |