Timeline for What does the newest IUPAC nomenclature have against unsaturation?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2017 at 8:51 | history | edited | Martin - マーチン♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:57 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://chemistry.stackexchange.com/ with https://chemistry.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 11, 2017 at 18:46 | vote | accept | M.A.R. | ||
| Feb 3, 2017 at 9:30 | answer | added | Martin - マーチン♦ | timeline score: 15 | |
| Feb 3, 2017 at 6:54 | comment | added | Black Jack 21 | Yes indeed. This doesn't make much sense. Troublesome for authors all over the world to keep up to date with these | |
| Feb 2, 2017 at 21:51 | comment | added | Curt F. | Interesting question. I must admit that I have a very dim view of changes of this sort. Isn't the "real" reason likely to be that the IUPAC nomenclature committee needed something to debate during their meetings? But perhaps I'm too cynical and there is a good reason for this one. I'll be watching this space to learn more... | |
| Feb 2, 2017 at 20:43 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackChemistry/status/827256144502480898 | ||
| Feb 2, 2017 at 20:33 | history | edited | M.A.R. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
be, Be, BE
|
| Feb 2, 2017 at 19:45 | history | asked | M.A.R. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |