Bumped by Community user
    Tweeted twitter.com/StackChemistry/status/839546858397700098
4 added 11 characters in body; edited tags
source | link

At my university, we had an organic chemistry exam question that stated,"The trend in the values of the ir absorbtions for the c-h bonds of methane ($\ce{CH4}$: $2995\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}$), (ethylene: $3080\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}$), and (acetylene: $3305\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}$) can be explained by...

The answer was " by the increasing bond strength of the carbon-carbon single, double, and triple bonds. I thought the correct answer was "increasing Ss character of the carbon atoms". Could I get an explanation as to why the first response is valid?

Thanks!

At my university, we had an organic chemistry exam question that stated,"The trend in the values of the ir absorbtions for the c-h bonds of methane ($\ce{CH4}$: $2995\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}$), (ethylene: $3080\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}$), and (acetylene: $3305\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}$) can be explained by...

The answer was " by the increasing bond strength of the carbon-carbon single, double, and triple bonds. I thought the correct answer was "increasing S character of the carbon atoms". Could I get an explanation as to why the first response is valid?

At my university, we had an organic chemistry exam question that stated,"The trend in the values of the ir absorbtions for the c-h bonds of methane ($\ce{CH4}$: $2995\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}$), (ethylene: $3080\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}$), and (acetylene: $3305\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}$) can be explained by...

The answer was " by the increasing bond strength of the carbon-carbon single, double, and triple bonds. I thought the correct answer was "increasing s character of the carbon atoms". Could I get an explanation as to why the first response is valid?

Thanks!

    Bumped by Community user
    Bumped by Community user
    Bumped by Community user
    Bumped by Community user
3 formatting, removed thanks
source | link

At my university, we had an organic chemistry exam question that stated,"The trend in the values of the ir absorbtions for the c-h bonds of methane ($\ce{CH4}$: $2995\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}$), (ethylene: $3080\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}$), and (acetylene: $3305\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}$) can be explained by...

The answer was " by the increasing bond strength of the carbon-carbon single, double, and triple bonds. I thought the correct answer was "increasing S character of the carbon atoms". Could I get an explanation as to why the first response is valid?

Thanks!

At my university, we had an organic chemistry exam question that stated,"The trend in the values of the ir absorbtions for the c-h bonds of methane ($\ce{CH4}$: $2995\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}$), (ethylene: $3080\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}$), and (acetylene: $3305\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}$) can be explained by...

The answer was " by the increasing bond strength of the carbon-carbon single, double, and triple bonds. I thought the correct answer was "increasing S character of the carbon atoms". Could I get an explanation as to why the first response is valid?

Thanks!

At my university, we had an organic chemistry exam question that stated,"The trend in the values of the ir absorbtions for the c-h bonds of methane ($\ce{CH4}$: $2995\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}$), (ethylene: $3080\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}$), and (acetylene: $3305\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}$) can be explained by...

The answer was " by the increasing bond strength of the carbon-carbon single, double, and triple bonds. I thought the correct answer was "increasing S character of the carbon atoms". Could I get an explanation as to why the first response is valid?

2 formatting
source | link

At my university, we had an organic chemistry exam question that stated,"The trend in the values of the ir absorbtions for the c-h bonds of methane (CH4;2995 cm^-1$\ce{CH4}$: $2995\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}$), (ehylene; 3080 cm^-1ethylene: $3080\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}$), and (acetylene; 3305 cm^-1acetylene: $3305\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}$) can be explained by...

The answer was ,"" by the increasing bond strength of the carbon- carboncarbon single, double, and triple bonds. I thought the correct answer was ,"increasing "increasing S character of the carbon atoms". Could I get an explanation as to why the first response is valid?

Thanks!

At my university, we had an organic chemistry exam question that stated,"The trend in the values of the ir absorbtions for the c-h bonds of methane (CH4;2995 cm^-1), (ehylene; 3080 cm^-1), and (acetylene; 3305 cm^-1) can be explained by...

The answer was ," by the increasing bond strength of the carbon- carbon single, double, and triple bonds. I thought the correct answer was ,"increasing S character of the carbon atoms". Could I get an explanation as to why the first response is valid?

Thanks!

At my university, we had an organic chemistry exam question that stated,"The trend in the values of the ir absorbtions for the c-h bonds of methane ($\ce{CH4}$: $2995\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}$), (ethylene: $3080\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}$), and (acetylene: $3305\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}$) can be explained by...

The answer was " by the increasing bond strength of the carbon-carbon single, double, and triple bonds. I thought the correct answer was "increasing S character of the carbon atoms". Could I get an explanation as to why the first response is valid?

Thanks!

1
source | link