Timeline for Quasi-steady state hypothesis application
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2015 at 19:35 | comment | added | Chet Miller | I realized that there were errors in the formulation only when I tried to apply our solution method, and the answer didn't work out. | |
| Nov 6, 2015 at 19:20 | comment | added | Curt F. | Thank you! I just copied the equations from the original post so I'm glad someone is out there checking this! | |
| Nov 6, 2015 at 19:14 | comment | added | Chet Miller | I also corrected a couple of errors from the equations in the original post that propagated into your answer. | |
| Nov 6, 2015 at 19:00 | comment | added | Curt F. | Thanks for letting me know. I don't always read comments and didn't in this case. I prefer to write answers instead. | |
| Nov 6, 2015 at 18:59 | history | edited | Curt F. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
\mathrm{d} doesn't belong in any text that I write. I disagree with that formatting.
|
| Nov 6, 2015 at 18:03 | history | edited | orthocresol | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
\mathrm{d}
|
| S Nov 6, 2015 at 17:59 | history | suggested | Chet Miller | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
I corrected some sign errors and subscript errors in the equations to make them consistent with the corrections to the problem statement
|
| Nov 6, 2015 at 17:37 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Nov 6, 2015 at 17:59 | |||||
| Nov 6, 2015 at 17:32 | comment | added | Chet Miller | This is the same exact method I outlined in the 9th comment to the original question. | |
| Nov 6, 2015 at 16:26 | vote | accept | Michael Howlard | ||
| Nov 6, 2015 at 14:24 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Nov 6, 2015 at 14:53 | |||||
| Nov 6, 2015 at 14:03 | history | answered | Curt F. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |