Skip to main content
Commonmark migration
Source Link

Well here's a question from my book:

A solution containing one mole per liter of each $\ce{Cu(NO3)2}$, $\ce{AgNO3}$, $\ce{Hg2(NO3)2}$ and $\ce{Mg(NO3)2}$ is being electrolysed by using inert electrodes. The values of standard electrode potentials in volts (reduction potentials) are:

 
  • $\ce{Ag+/Ag} = +0.80$,
  • $\ce{Hg2^2+/Hg} = +0.79$,
  • $\ce{Cu^2+/Cu} = +0.34$,
  • $\ce{Mg^2+/Mg} = -2.37$
 

The sequence of deposition of the metals on the cathode will be?

The answer to the above question is: $\ce{Ag}$, $\ce{Hg}$, $\ce{Cu}$.

Why isn't Mg deposited on the cathode? Is it because the reduction potential is negative?
If yes, what exactly is the reason?

Well here's a question from my book:

A solution containing one mole per liter of each $\ce{Cu(NO3)2}$, $\ce{AgNO3}$, $\ce{Hg2(NO3)2}$ and $\ce{Mg(NO3)2}$ is being electrolysed by using inert electrodes. The values of standard electrode potentials in volts (reduction potentials) are:

 
  • $\ce{Ag+/Ag} = +0.80$,
  • $\ce{Hg2^2+/Hg} = +0.79$,
  • $\ce{Cu^2+/Cu} = +0.34$,
  • $\ce{Mg^2+/Mg} = -2.37$
 

The sequence of deposition of the metals on the cathode will be?

The answer to the above question is: $\ce{Ag}$, $\ce{Hg}$, $\ce{Cu}$.

Why isn't Mg deposited on the cathode? Is it because the reduction potential is negative?
If yes, what exactly is the reason?

Well here's a question from my book:

A solution containing one mole per liter of each $\ce{Cu(NO3)2}$, $\ce{AgNO3}$, $\ce{Hg2(NO3)2}$ and $\ce{Mg(NO3)2}$ is being electrolysed by using inert electrodes. The values of standard electrode potentials in volts (reduction potentials) are:

  • $\ce{Ag+/Ag} = +0.80$,
  • $\ce{Hg2^2+/Hg} = +0.79$,
  • $\ce{Cu^2+/Cu} = +0.34$,
  • $\ce{Mg^2+/Mg} = -2.37$

The sequence of deposition of the metals on the cathode will be?

The answer to the above question is: $\ce{Ag}$, $\ce{Hg}$, $\ce{Cu}$.

Why isn't Mg deposited on the cathode? Is it because the reduction potential is negative?
If yes, what exactly is the reason?

Well here's a question from my book:

A solution containing one mole per liter of each $\ce{Cu(NO3)2}$, $\ce{AgNO3}$, $\ce{Hg2(NO3)2}$ and $\ce{Mg(NO3)2}$ is being electrolysed by using inert electrodes. The values of standard electrode potentials in volts (reduction potentials) are:

  • $\ce{Ag+/Ag} = +0.80$,
  • $\ce{Hg2^2+/Hg} = +0.79$,
  • $\ce{Cu^2+/Cu} = +0.34$,
  • $\ce{Mg^2+/Mg} = -2.37$

The sequence of deposition of the metals on the cathode will be?

The answer to the above question is: Ag$\ce{Ag}$, Hg$\ce{Hg}$, Cu$\ce{Cu}$.
Why

Why isn't Mg deposited on the cathode? Is it because the reduction potential is negative?
If yes, what exactly is the reason?

Well here's a question from my book:

A solution containing one mole per liter of each $\ce{Cu(NO3)2}$, $\ce{AgNO3}$, $\ce{Hg2(NO3)2}$ and $\ce{Mg(NO3)2}$ is being electrolysed by using inert electrodes. The values of standard electrode potentials in volts (reduction potentials) are:

  • $\ce{Ag+/Ag} = +0.80$,
  • $\ce{Hg2^2+/Hg} = +0.79$,
  • $\ce{Cu^2+/Cu} = +0.34$,
  • $\ce{Mg^2+/Mg} = -2.37$

The sequence of deposition of the metals on the cathode will be?

The answer to the above question is: Ag, Hg, Cu.
Why isn't Mg deposited on the cathode? Is it because the reduction potential is negative?
If yes, what exactly is the reason?

Well here's a question from my book:

A solution containing one mole per liter of each $\ce{Cu(NO3)2}$, $\ce{AgNO3}$, $\ce{Hg2(NO3)2}$ and $\ce{Mg(NO3)2}$ is being electrolysed by using inert electrodes. The values of standard electrode potentials in volts (reduction potentials) are:

  • $\ce{Ag+/Ag} = +0.80$,
  • $\ce{Hg2^2+/Hg} = +0.79$,
  • $\ce{Cu^2+/Cu} = +0.34$,
  • $\ce{Mg^2+/Mg} = -2.37$

The sequence of deposition of the metals on the cathode will be?

The answer to the above question is: $\ce{Ag}$, $\ce{Hg}$, $\ce{Cu}$.

Why isn't Mg deposited on the cathode? Is it because the reduction potential is negative?
If yes, what exactly is the reason?

Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackChemistry/status/611701407616512000
added 2 characters in body
Source Link
user7951
user7951

Well here's a question from my book:

A solution containing one mole per liter of each $\ce{Cu(NO3)2}$, $\ce{AgNO3}$, $\ce{Hg(NO3)2}$$\ce{Hg2(NO3)2}$ and $\ce{Mg(NO3)2}$ is being electrolysed by using inert electrodes. The values of standard electrode potentials in volts (reduction potentials) are:

  • $\ce{Ag+/Ag} = +0.80$,
  • $\ce{Hg^2+/Hg} = +0.79$$\ce{Hg2^2+/Hg} = +0.79$,
  • $\ce{Cu^2+/Cu} = +0.34$,
  • $\ce{Mg^2+/Mg} = -2.37$

The sequence of deposition of the metals on the cathode will be?

The answer to the above question is: Ag, Hg, Cu.
Why isn't Mg deposited on the cathode? Is it because the reduction potential is negative?
If yes, what exactly is the reason?

Well here's a question from my book:

A solution containing one mole per liter of each $\ce{Cu(NO3)2}$, $\ce{AgNO3}$, $\ce{Hg(NO3)2}$ and $\ce{Mg(NO3)2}$ is being electrolysed by using inert electrodes. The values of standard electrode potentials in volts (reduction potentials) are:

  • $\ce{Ag+/Ag} = +0.80$,
  • $\ce{Hg^2+/Hg} = +0.79$,
  • $\ce{Cu^2+/Cu} = +0.34$,
  • $\ce{Mg^2+/Mg} = -2.37$

The sequence of deposition of the metals on the cathode will be?

The answer to the above question is: Ag, Hg, Cu.
Why isn't Mg deposited on the cathode? Is it because the reduction potential is negative?
If yes, what exactly is the reason?

Well here's a question from my book:

A solution containing one mole per liter of each $\ce{Cu(NO3)2}$, $\ce{AgNO3}$, $\ce{Hg2(NO3)2}$ and $\ce{Mg(NO3)2}$ is being electrolysed by using inert electrodes. The values of standard electrode potentials in volts (reduction potentials) are:

  • $\ce{Ag+/Ag} = +0.80$,
  • $\ce{Hg2^2+/Hg} = +0.79$,
  • $\ce{Cu^2+/Cu} = +0.34$,
  • $\ce{Mg^2+/Mg} = -2.37$

The sequence of deposition of the metals on the cathode will be?

The answer to the above question is: Ag, Hg, Cu.
Why isn't Mg deposited on the cathode? Is it because the reduction potential is negative?
If yes, what exactly is the reason?

Improved formatting, most notably by adding MathJax
Source Link
Loading
Source Link
Tabish Mir
  • 1.1k
  • 1
  • 11
  • 24
Loading