Timeline for What is the justification for Hückel's rule?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 29, 2018 at 22:20 | history | edited | orthocresol | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited tags; edited title
|
Jan 7, 2018 at 2:01 | history | edited | orthocresol |
edited tags
|
|
Jun 4, 2015 at 15:19 | answer | added | Breaking Bioinformatics | timeline score: 12 | |
S May 11, 2015 at 6:26 | history | edited | ringo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
spelling and grammar
|
S May 11, 2015 at 6:26 | history | suggested | Rajat Jain | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Spell correction for Hückel
|
May 11, 2015 at 6:21 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S May 11, 2015 at 6:26 | |||||
May 6, 2015 at 18:26 | comment | added | Mithoron | Do have problem with H. Rule specifically or aromacity generally? | |
May 6, 2015 at 18:22 | comment | added | Mithoron | onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcc.20470/full | |
May 6, 2015 at 5:50 | comment | added | Philipp | Maybe also the first part of this answer of mine which gives some electronic explanation where the stabilization associated with aromaticity comes from might be of interest to you. | |
May 6, 2015 at 4:12 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackChemistry/status/595803317466492928 | ||
May 6, 2015 at 2:29 | comment | added | Ben Norris | The short version is that "antiaromatic" compounds would have two unpaired nonbonding elections (see the Frost Circle in ron's link), meaning that they would be diradicals. Other "antiaromatic" compounds have electrons in antibonding orbitals, counteracting the "resonance" stability. | |
May 6, 2015 at 2:22 | comment | added | ron | Look at this earlier answer, the "Edit: Huckel's Rule: Aromaticity - Antiaromaticity" section may provide what you are looking for. | |
May 6, 2015 at 0:35 | history | asked | CognisMantis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |