Timeline for Are phenyl and allyl groups in prop-2-enylbenzene coplanar?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2021 at 12:08 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Feb 24, 2021 at 12:14 | |||||
| Feb 24, 2021 at 11:32 | answer | added | matt_black | timeline score: 3 | |
| Feb 24, 2021 at 9:05 | history | edited | andselisk♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Corrected for the less ambiguous name
|
| Feb 24, 2021 at 8:33 | history | edited | andselisk♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 9 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
|
| Feb 18, 2021 at 16:57 | review | Close votes | |||
| Feb 24, 2021 at 8:33 | |||||
| Feb 18, 2021 at 16:18 | comment | added | deuti | Yes sp2 carbon is planar and sp3 isn't It depends if that is a transition state, a byproduct or the main product (probably not). To find the molecule with the lowest energy you have to do a theoretical calculation or measure the XRD in certain properties. | |
| Feb 18, 2021 at 16:09 | comment | added | Alchimista | @HarryHolmes with reference to your last comment - to which Ivan Neretin already replied - I suggest that you read my answer to chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/146178/… as it is strongly related as well as it clarifies some uses of terms. | |
| Feb 18, 2021 at 13:57 | comment | added | Ivan Neretin | It is a mutual thing. Planarity is a requirement for conjugation, and conjugation enforces planarity. | |
| Feb 18, 2021 at 13:42 | comment | added | harry | @Ivan Neretin; wait, ring planarity is due to conjugation? I thought planarity was a requirement for the latter. | |
| Feb 18, 2021 at 13:41 | history | edited | harry | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 20 characters in body
|
| Feb 18, 2021 at 13:35 | comment | added | Ivan Neretin | That's right, there is no conjugation, hence no reason for the whole thing to be planar. | |
| Feb 18, 2021 at 13:23 | history | asked | harry | CC BY-SA 4.0 |