Timeline for Denticity of bridging ligands
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2021 at 15:10 | vote | accept | K. Chopra | ||
| Sep 10, 2020 at 11:10 | comment | added | Jan | I think these two questions are sufficiently different to not warrant a dupe-closure. This one asks ‘What is the denticity of bridging ligands’ while the other asks ‘can an atom with multiple lone pair donate twice (I assume, although it isn’t implicit, to the same atom)?’. Full disclosure: I have a horse in the race as I have answered here. | |
| Sep 10, 2020 at 0:46 | review | Close votes | |||
| Sep 21, 2020 at 10:26 | |||||
| Sep 10, 2020 at 0:26 | comment | added | Mithoron | Does this answer your question? Why Cl⁻ can't act as bidentate ligand? | |
| Sep 9, 2020 at 12:26 | comment | added | Aniruddha Deb | I was wrong. Jan's answer clears that up. Bridging ligands with a single donor atom are monodentate. | |
| Sep 9, 2020 at 10:51 | answer | added | Jan | timeline score: 7 | |
| Sep 9, 2020 at 9:09 | comment | added | K. Chopra | My professor told us bridging ligands are monodentate, including mu-hydroxo ligands | |
| Sep 9, 2020 at 6:55 | history | edited | Rahul Verma | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 5 characters in body
|
| Sep 9, 2020 at 6:50 | history | asked | K. Chopra | CC BY-SA 4.0 |