Skip to main content
added 3 characters in body; edited tags
Source Link
andselisk
  • 38.5k
  • 14
  • 133
  • 223

For a solution of $\ce{HA-}$, I have seen the following approximations for the pH:$\mathrm{pH}:$

  1. $\textrm{pH}=\frac{1}{2}(\textrm{pKa1}+\textrm{pKa2})$

  2. $\textrm{pH}=\sqrt{\frac{\textrm{K1}\times\textrm{K2}\times\ce{[HA-]}+\textrm{K1}\times\textrm{Kw}}{\textrm{K1}+\ce{[HA^-]}}}$

$$\mathrm{pH} = \frac{1}{2}(\mathrm{p}K_\mathrm{a1} + \mathrm{p}K_\mathrm{a2})\tag{1}$$

$$\mathrm{pH} = \sqrt{\frac{K_1K_2[\ce{HA-}] + K_1K_\mathrm{w}}{K_1 + [\ce{HA-}]}}\tag{2}$$

How do they differ? Is the second approximation always more accurate than the first? I know that the second is derived from the mass and charge balance equations and the first is the same as the second, with several assumptions.

For a solution of $\ce{HA-}$, I have seen the following approximations for the pH:

  1. $\textrm{pH}=\frac{1}{2}(\textrm{pKa1}+\textrm{pKa2})$

  2. $\textrm{pH}=\sqrt{\frac{\textrm{K1}\times\textrm{K2}\times\ce{[HA-]}+\textrm{K1}\times\textrm{Kw}}{\textrm{K1}+\ce{[HA^-]}}}$

How do they differ? Is the second approximation always more accurate than the first? I know that the second is derived from the mass and charge balance equations and the first is the same as the second, with several assumptions.

For a solution of $\ce{HA-}$, I have seen the following approximations for the $\mathrm{pH}:$

$$\mathrm{pH} = \frac{1}{2}(\mathrm{p}K_\mathrm{a1} + \mathrm{p}K_\mathrm{a2})\tag{1}$$

$$\mathrm{pH} = \sqrt{\frac{K_1K_2[\ce{HA-}] + K_1K_\mathrm{w}}{K_1 + [\ce{HA-}]}}\tag{2}$$

How do they differ? Is the second approximation always more accurate than the first? I know that the second is derived from the mass and charge balance equations and the first is the same as the second, with several assumptions.

minor adjustment to mathjax
Source Link
Buck Thorn
  • 22.9k
  • 5
  • 39
  • 91

For a solution of $\text{HA-}$$\ce{HA-}$, I have seen the following approximations for the pH:

  1. $\text{pH}=\frac{1}{2}(\text{pKa1}+\text{pKa2})$$\textrm{pH}=\frac{1}{2}(\textrm{pKa1}+\textrm{pKa2})$

  2. $\text{pH}=\sqrt{\frac{(\text{K1}*\text{K2}*\text{[HA-]}+\text{K1}*\text{Kw})}{(\text{K1}+\text{[HA-]})}}$$\textrm{pH}=\sqrt{\frac{\textrm{K1}\times\textrm{K2}\times\ce{[HA-]}+\textrm{K1}\times\textrm{Kw}}{\textrm{K1}+\ce{[HA^-]}}}$

How do they differ? Is the second approximation always more accurate than the first? I know that the second is derived from the mass and charge balance equations and the first is the same as the second, with several assumptions.

For a solution of $\text{HA-}$, I have seen the following approximations for the pH:

  1. $\text{pH}=\frac{1}{2}(\text{pKa1}+\text{pKa2})$

  2. $\text{pH}=\sqrt{\frac{(\text{K1}*\text{K2}*\text{[HA-]}+\text{K1}*\text{Kw})}{(\text{K1}+\text{[HA-]})}}$

How do they differ? Is the second approximation always more accurate than the first? I know that the second is derived from the mass and charge balance equations and the first is the same as the second, with several assumptions.

For a solution of $\ce{HA-}$, I have seen the following approximations for the pH:

  1. $\textrm{pH}=\frac{1}{2}(\textrm{pKa1}+\textrm{pKa2})$

  2. $\textrm{pH}=\sqrt{\frac{\textrm{K1}\times\textrm{K2}\times\ce{[HA-]}+\textrm{K1}\times\textrm{Kw}}{\textrm{K1}+\ce{[HA^-]}}}$

How do they differ? Is the second approximation always more accurate than the first? I know that the second is derived from the mass and charge balance equations and the first is the same as the second, with several assumptions.

Source Link
Cyclopropane
  • 2.1k
  • 1
  • 26
  • 51

pH of amphoteric species

For a solution of $\text{HA-}$, I have seen the following approximations for the pH:

  1. $\text{pH}=\frac{1}{2}(\text{pKa1}+\text{pKa2})$

  2. $\text{pH}=\sqrt{\frac{(\text{K1}*\text{K2}*\text{[HA-]}+\text{K1}*\text{Kw})}{(\text{K1}+\text{[HA-]})}}$

How do they differ? Is the second approximation always more accurate than the first? I know that the second is derived from the mass and charge balance equations and the first is the same as the second, with several assumptions.