Skip to main content

Timeline for Is omega 3 a specific fatty acid?

Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0

8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 11, 2019 at 4:27 comment added FrankS @Volker: That is correct. I have added an edit to the answer.
Jul 11, 2019 at 4:19 history edited FrankS CC BY-SA 4.0
added 109 characters in body
Jul 9, 2019 at 12:55 comment added Volker Siegel @FrankS So is Eicosapentaenoic acid a ω-3 instead of ω-3,6,9,12,15 acid? (If yes, could you edit?)
Jul 9, 2019 at 12:20 history edited Martin - マーチン CC BY-SA 4.0
contracted links, remove unnecessary fluff
Jul 9, 2019 at 5:51 comment added FrankS Thank you theorist, you are off course quite right when pointing out that the ω-nomeclature only refers to the first double bond. I stand corrected :-)
Jul 9, 2019 at 1:34 comment added theorist I'll add the reason the ω notation is used is that organisms typically elongate fatty acids from the carboxylic acid end, so the ω-number of a fatty acid stays constant through this process. Thus if you eat an 18:3ω3 fatty acid, your body can convert it to EPA (20:5ω3) or DHA (22:6ω3) by elongating it and adding double bonds. But your body can't make DHA from, say, 18:1ω9 or 18:2ω6.
Jul 9, 2019 at 1:29 comment added theorist Actually, the ω designation refers to the position of the first double bond from the methyl end. Thus, since the first double bond from the methyl end in EPA is at carbon 3, it is an ω3 fatty acid, not an ω3,6,9,12,15 fatty acid (the other double bonds aren't the first from the methyl end, and are thus not used in determining the ω notation).
Jul 8, 2019 at 12:18 history answered FrankS CC BY-SA 4.0