-1
$\begingroup$

A $\pu{0.45 M}$ solution of a weak acid, $\ce{HX}$, has a $\pu{pH}$ of $4.5$. What is the ionization constant, $K_a$, of the acid?

  • $\ce{[HX]}$ is already given as $\pu{0.45 M}$.
  • $\ce{[H+]}$ is given by $10^{-4.5}$.

Since $\ce{pH}$ is $4.5$, $\ce{pOH} = 14 - 4.5 = 9.5$. Then we can get $\ce{[OH^-]}$ by computing $10^{-9.5}$.

Then computing $K_a$, I get $$\frac{10^{-4.5} \cdot 10^{-9.5}}{0.45} = 2.22 \times 10^{-14}.$$ But that is apparently not the right answer. What did I do wrong?

$\endgroup$
1
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ $$K_\mathrm a = \frac{[\ce{H+}][\ce{X-}]}{[\ce{HX}]} \neq \frac{[\ce{H+}][\ce{OH-}]}{[\ce{HX}]}$$ $\endgroup$ Apr 22, 2018 at 13:38

2 Answers 2

1
$\begingroup$

Look at the answer given here and modify it: How to set up equation for buffer reaction?

In your case the concentration of base $c_B \approx 0$ and $[\ce{OH^-}] = K_\mathrm{w}/[\ce{H^+}] \approx 0$, so that the equation reduces to $$K_\mathrm{a} = \frac{[\ce{H^+}]^2}{c_\mathrm{a}-[\ce{H^+}]} \approx \frac{[\ce{H^+}]^2}{c_\mathrm{a}},$$ as $c_\mathrm{a}$ is so large.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Forget about $\ce{[OH^-]}$. This is $K_\mathrm{a}$ we're talking about - the acid dissociation constant. Remember that the equation for $K_\mathrm{a}$ is:

$$K_\mathrm{a} = \frac{[\ce{H^{+}}] [\ce{A^{-}}]} {[\ce{HA}]}$$

As you can see, $\ce{[OH^{-}]}$ doesn't come into the equation.

In terms of data, $\ce{[A^{-}]}$ hasn't been provided, and so we can assume that $$[\ce{H^+}][\ce{A^-}] \approx [\ce{H^{+}}]^2.$$ Also, the $\ce{[H^{+}]}$ you provided looks more like a $\ce{pH}$ conversion, so $[\ce{H^+}] = 10^{-4.5} = \pu{3.16x10^-5 mol dm^-3}$. Putting all of this together means that:

$$K_\mathrm{a} \approx \frac{[\ce{H^{+}}]^2}{\ce{HA}} = \frac{(3.16\times10^{-5})^2}{0.45} = \pu{2.22x10^-9 mol dm^-3}.$$

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ It is evident from $\ce{HA <=> H+ + A-}$, that $c(\ce{H+})=c(\ce{A-})$, hence $[\ce{H^+}][\ce{A^-}] = [\ce{H^+}]^2$. Nevertheless, this answer is still not quite correct, as it includes the approximation $c(\ce{HA})-c(\ce{H+}) \approx c(\ce{HA})$, which should be proven to hold here. $\endgroup$ Nov 4, 2019 at 11:10
  • $\begingroup$ But c(HA + A-) = 0.45 M. Since we say cH+ = cA- , then cHA = 0.45 - cA- = 0.45 - cH+ = 0.45 - 3.16 e-5, which is ~0.45. $\endgroup$ Nov 4, 2019 at 14:25

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.