Take the 2-minute tour ×
Chemistry Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for scientists, academics, teachers and students. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The most common drying agent I encountered when using a vacuum dessicator was phosphorus pentoxide in the form of Sicapent. But I've recently encountered people using KOH as a cheaper alternative (in a practical course for students, where such costs are amplified due to the high number of students).

What are the differences between KOH and phosphorus pentoxide as a general purpose drying agents to remove water? Is there a difference in effectiveness? Are there classes of substances where you can't use one of those drying agents?

share|improve this question

3 Answers 3

up vote 11 down vote accepted

I found this page, which recreates information from Purification of Laboratory Chemicals, by Perrin and Armarego. It provides a qualitative ranking of drying agents, listing phosphorous pentoxide higher than KOH. The two drying agents work by different means:

KOH

Anhydrous KOH is hygroscopic. It absorbs water from the atmosphere. It much better at doing so than more common hygroscopic drying agents like calcium chloride or calcium sulfate (drierite). A pellet of KOH left out in a beaker or dish open to the air will have absorbed so much water vapor within an hour that it will now be a solution of KOH (that will continue to be hygroscopic, at least until the solution is 50% water). Calcium chloride and calcium sulfate only continue to absorb water until they reach their maximum hydration.

P4O10

Phosphorous pentoxide (really P4O10) is an anhydride of phosphoric acid. Phosphorous pentoxide reacts with water to form phosphoric acid: $$\ce{P4O10 + 6H2O -> 4H3PO4}$$ Phosphoric acid is also hygroscopic and absorbs water to form a solution.

Since P4O10 is water reactive it is more difficult and dangerous to handle, especially for large groups of students. I might not use P4O10 if the substance being dried is very acid sensitive. Eventually, the vacuum will start volatilizing the acid. I might not use KOH for compounds that are incredibly base sensitive, although it is unlikely that KOH will sublime. In an undergraduate lab with multiple students, KOH should be fine if you want to save money and hassle.

share|improve this answer
    
This answer is exactly right and deserves to be marked as correct. –  trb456 Jul 28 '12 at 2:29

Usage of drying agent is ruled by four factors: cost, effectiveness, reactions it can provoke in substance being dried, level of discomfort in working process.

$P_2O_5$ is much more effective, $KOH$ is cheaper and easier to handle. $P_2O_5$ is also acidic and $KOH$ is basic. There are substances that die in acidic environment (acetales) and those that die in basic environment (halogen-anhydrides).

share|improve this answer

$\small \ce{P2O5}$ is an acidic oxide while $\small\ce{KOH}$ is a base. So if you want to dry substances which are acidic you must use $\small \ce{P2O5}$, while if you want to dry a substance that is basic in nature, you have to use $\small\ce{KOH}$.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.