Chemistry Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for scientists, academics, teachers and students. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm new to Chemistry and in my textbook, it describes the Law of Definite Proportions and then goes on to describe the Law of Multiple Proportions.

The example they give is carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide, where the mass ratio of oxygen to carbon in carbon dioxide is 2.67:1 and the mass ratio of oxygen to carbon in carbon monoxide is 1.33:1.

I understand the above example, and I understand that when you compare them in the following way:

2.67g (proportion of oxygen to 1g carbon in carbon dioxide)/ 1.33g (proportion of oxygen to 1g carbon in carbon monoxide) = 2.00, a small whole number.

$\frac{Mass~oxygen~to~1g~carbon~in~carbon~dioxide}{Mass~oxygen~to~1g~carbon~in~carbon~monoxide}$ = $\frac{2.67g}{1.33g}$ = 2.00

My textbook doesn't describe what a small whole number is, or what it means... just that, in this example, 2.00 is a small whole number.

What is the significance of the 2.00?

I understand that carbon dioxide has double the oxygen. Is this where the 2.00 plays a role?

share|improve this question
Thanks a lot for asking this question, it's hard to find an answer to this on the web. – abenthy Apr 2 '13 at 14:22
up vote 6 down vote accepted

The law of multiple proportions is largely obsolete these days because we all believe that atoms exist. Prior to about 1900 this and similar laws were used to show that, for example, the ratio of oxygen in $\ce{CO}$ to oxygen in $\ce{CO2}$ is 2:1.

Of course that's trivially obvious when we write the formulas, but before we believed in atoms the "small whole number" ratios were used as an example of an experimental situation (the 2:1 ratio) could be explained by atoms (i.e. quantizing atomic masses.)

Today, the law causes more confusion than it cures. Atoms are here to stay.

share|improve this answer

There's no universally accepted hard cut-off, as far as I'm aware, which determines the range of numbers that would constitute "small" mass ratios. Generally, all textbook examples select compounds that yield single-digit mass ratios. The significance of the ratios being small (as well as their constancy and the limited number of different mass ratios for binary compounds actually found in nature) is that they allow for reliable conclusions to made about the stoichiometric proportions in which elements combine based on crude empirical data alone, as well as leading to conjectures about the number of possible configurations, bond arrangements, and oxidation states yielding said combinations.

The law is valid for a large variety of binary compounds simply by virtue of the fact that there is typically a limited number of permutations in which two given elements can be combined to yield a stable compound. For example, C and O have only two, N and O have only four, metals have a limited number of oxidation states, therefore giving rise to relatively few possibly formulas for binary ionic compounds, etc. The law breaks down for cases in which two elements can combine to form long chains or complex molecules (e.g., large hydrocarbons and [mostly hypothetical] silicon analogues), when the mass ratios can sometimes become quite large.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.