We have a well that delivers hard water and we do not have a water softener. (There was a “green sand filter” that utilizes permanganate to oxidize other metals on the system, but it has been disconnected.) Analysis of the well water shows the presence of iron in noticeable amounts. No other metal ions were specifically identified. The system does have an ozonator to oxidize Fe (II) to Fe (III). Over the last couple of years, the porcelain toilet bowls have developed a blue ring at the air/water interface. When you scrub on the blue ring, it doesn’t feel like there is a deposit present (like normal hard water deposits). The ring is unresponsive to ammonia (household), strong acid (6 M HCL) or strong base (Drano), as well as to hydrogen peroxide (30 %). (We haven’t tried a good reducing agent yet.) So, my question is, does anyone have an idea of what is causing the blue color? Is it possible that porcelain reacted chemically with salts, urea, uric acid, oxygen, etc? Not an earth-shattering theoretical question, but I’m chemically curious as to what this could be if anyone has any ideas.
Toilet bowls are made of ceramics which can contain feldspar. Toilet bowls also often have a feldspar glaze. There is a study that disolved Cr(VI) can be removed by feldspar.
Studies on the removal of Cr(VI) from waste-water by feldspar http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jctb.280530204/abstract
The IMA currently recognizes 90 Cr bearing minerals. 16 minerals if you only count those that contain also Si. Feldspar can be either K, Na or Ca-Feldspar. Of those 16 minerals 6 contain Na, 2 K and 5 Ca. Reading those papers might even narrow the choices down to a couple of minerals that can form in standard-toilet-bowl-conditions.
Mineral database that lets you select minerals by their chemistry: http://rruff.info/ima/
I think that unless you are willing to donate your toilet bowl to science that the answer won't get any more precise than this.
Edit: Cu would be the favorite choice for a blue color mineral (Azurite, ...). There is also a study about the removal of copper by feldspar:
Experimental studies of the interaction of aqueous metal cations with mineral substrates: Lead, cadmium, and copper with perthitic feldspar, muscovite, and biotite http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016703797001178
Again there are 603 Cu-minerals. Cu+Si=32 minerals. With the common Feldspar cations your left with about 10 each. I don't think the minerals could be recognized visually. The favorite method would be x-ray diffraction of a powder sample of the blue stuff.