Tell me more ×
Chemistry Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for scientists, academics, teachers and students. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am doing a basic chemistry paper by correspondance over the holidays from my university.

I am unsure if I am going in the right direction for basic redox.

I can understand redox equations of the following form, I break these down into half equations and combine them.

$$\ce{MnO_4^- + C_2O_4^{2-} -> Mn^{2+} + CO_2}$$


Where I have issues is with the following (unbalanced) equation

$$\ce{H_2 + NO -> NH_3 + H_2O}$$

I am asked to show balanced half equations and the final combined equation.

I can see the following changes in oxidation states
reduction: $$\ce{ H -> H^{1+} + e^{1-} }$$ (for both the H in H2O and NH3)
oxidation: $$\ce{ N^{2+} + 5e^- -> N^{3-} }$$


My issue is then with balancing these and combining them, I am not sure if the half equation involving $\ce{H}$ should have $\ce{H2O}$ as the product or the $\ce{H3}$ from $\ce{NH3}$.

  1. How should I go about breaking this into half equations?

  2. Is it ok for both the half-equations to have molecules of the same compound in the product?

  3. Should I ever have water as the product when trying to show a half equation (ie $\ce{H -> H_2O}$)?

share|improve this question

1 Answer

up vote 4 down vote accepted

Assuming this reaction is taking place in aqueous phase, you can follow the conventional 7 steps for balancing redox reactions although this one does require some extra thoughts.
I will be writing the equation as it should be after each step.


$$\ce{H2 + NO -> NH3 + H2O}$$

Step 1: Ionise the required compounds and remove spectator ions

None of the compounds on either side are ionic other than $\small\ce{H2O}$ also we have no spectator ions as well. $$\small\ce{H2 + NO -> NH3 + H+ + OH-}$$

Step 2: Split into Oxidation and reduction halves

This is where the thought is required, if you decide of taking the oxidation half as $\ce{H2 -> NH3}$ (you can't simply take $\ce{H3^3-}$ as $\ce{NH3}$ is not ionic rather covalent) you would never be able to balance the nitrogen as the only source of nitrogen is $\ce{NO}$ if you observe the left hand side.
So it is decided that hydrogen cannot convert into ammonia, leaving us with only one option $\ce{H2 -> H2O}$.

$$ \begin{array}{l|r} \text{Oxidation Half} & \text{Reduction half} \\ \hline \ce{H2 -> H+ + OH-} & \ce{NO -> NH3} \end{array} $$

Step 3: Balance only those atoms undergoing redox

$$ \begin{array}{l|r} \text{Oxidation Half} & \text{Reduction half} \\ \hline \ce{H2 -> H+ + OH-} & \ce{NO -> NH3} \\ \text{(because Hydrogen is } & \text{(because only Nitrogen } \\ \text{undergoing redox but} & \text{is undergoing redox,} \\ \text{Oxygen is not.)} & \text{it's already balanced)} \\ \end{array} $$

Step 4: Balance Oxygen by adding water($\ \small\ce{H2O}\ $)

$$ \begin{array}{l|r} \text{Oxidation Half} & \text{Reduction half} \\ \hline \ce{H2 + H2O -> H+ + OH-} & \ce{NO -> NH3 + H2O} \end{array} $$

Step 5: Balance Hydrogen by adding $\ \small\ce{H+}$

$$ \begin{array}{l|r} \text{Oxidation Half} & \text{Reduction half} \\ \hline \ce{H2 + H2O -> H+ + OH- + 2H+} & \ce{NO + 5H+ -> NH3 + H2O} \\ \ce{H2 + H2O -> 3H+ + OH-} & \ce{NO + 5H+ -> NH3 + H2O} \end{array} $$

→ If medium is basic add equal amount of $\small\ce{OH-}$ to $\small\ce{H+}$ and combine them to make $\small\ce{H2O}$


Till the above steps mass has been balanced, now $\small\ce{H+}$ and $\small\ce{OH-}$ can be combined to form $\small\ce{H2O}$ and on further simplification oxidation half becomes $\small\ce{H2 -> 2H+}$


Step 6: Balance charge in each side of each half by adding electrons

$$ \begin{array}{l|r} \text{Oxidation Half} & \text{Reduction half} \\ \hline \ce{H2 -> 2H+ + 2e-} & \ce{NO + 5H+ + 5e- -> NH3 + H2O} \end{array} $$

→ Verify correctness by ensuring electrons are on right hand side in oxidation half and on left hand side in reduction half.

Step 7: Make net electrons produced equal to net electrons consumed

Multiply oxidation half by 5 and reduction half by 2 (this is basically like taking the LCM and multiplying both halves to make the number of electrons equal to the LCM, here 10.)

$$ \begin{array}{l|r} \text{Oxidation Half} & \text{Reduction half} \\ \hline \ce{5H2 -> 10H+ + 10e-} & \ce{2NO + 10H+ + 10e- -> 2NH3 + 2H2O} \end{array} $$

Finally add the two halves and cancel out the common cmopounds and you get the balanced equation $$\begin{matrix} \ce{&5H2 + &2NO + &10H+ + &10e- &-> &10H+ + &10e- + &2NH3 + &2H2O} \\ \ce{&5H2 + &2NO & & &-> & & &2NH3 + &2H2O}\\ \end{matrix}$$


In this case the oxidation half could have been directly/trivially stated as $\small\ce{H2 -> 2H+}$

share|improve this answer
I guess StackExchange will start charging me if I post answers as big as this henceforth... – Aditya Sriram Jan 1 at 6:49
Well, we haven't yet started charging Terry yet (see his answers on Chem and Physics). And they didn't charge me for chemistry.stackexchange.com/users/83/terry-bollinger or physics.stackexchange.com/questions/19372/… , so I doub't they'll do anything about your tiny answer ;-) – ManishEarth Jan 1 at 13:32
Right after posting that comment I went to this thread and thought to myself "Nope they won't charge me, If they did, these people from the above thread will go bankrupt". I came to know there was a maximum character limit of 30000. – Aditya Sriram Jan 1 at 14:55
Yeah, there is. Closest I've gotten is 27k characters, in this post of mine. [Read that if you have the time, it's relevant to everyone who uses SE] – ManishEarth Jan 1 at 15:00
@AdityaSriram Thank you very much for your answer, it didn't feel correct to have H2O as the RHS for the oxidation of hydrogen, so I went on a wild goose chase. Thank you for your clear explanation. – cjh Jan 2 at 3:27

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.