Chemistry Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for scientists, academics, teachers and students. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Is half-full rule and full rule allowed on 6th and 7th period?
Note: Half-full rules is Hund Rules.

Example: What is the right electron configuration?
$W [Xe] 6s^2 4f^{14} 5d^4$ (doesn't use half full rule) or
$W [Xe] 6s^1 4f^{14} 5d^5$ (use half full rule)

share|improve this question
up vote 3 down vote accepted

Short answer: no! The first known exception to occur in the periodic table is in period 5: niobium’s ground state electronic configuration is:

Nb: [Kr] 5s1 4d4

which is not warranted by the “usual” rules for determining electronic configuration. So, the “half-full rule” is not sufficient in periods 5 and higher.

Let’s look at Wikipedia’s list of exceptions to Madelung’s rule. In period 4, the only exceptions are Cr and Cu, which are accounted for by the “half-full rule”. (Don’t bother too much about the dispute for Ni.)

In period 5, the exceptions to Madelung’s rule are classified in three groups:

  • Mo and Ag: they are the analogues of Cu and Cr
  • Pd is 5s0 4d10: a different type of application of the explanation that “fully filled shells are particularly stable”, because in this case two electrons from the s shell were pulled into the d shell. Not what you usually learn.
  • Nb is 5s1 4d4, and Ru is 5s1 4d7: these cannot be explained by simple rules, and one has to perform complex quantum chemistry calculations to understand these electronic configurations.

Period 6 contains further inconsistencies, because of the introduction of f orbitals into the mix.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.