Take the 2-minute tour ×
Chemistry Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for scientists, academics, teachers and students. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Why isn't Neptunium used in nuclear reactors in nuclear power plants? Uranium is, and Plutonium is. But Neptunium isn't and it is in the middle of them. Is it like it is too hard to make it do fission? Can someone please explain it to me?

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

There are several reasons that neptunium may not be used.

The first is the abundance of neptunium. From Wikipedia, it states the best source is from spent fuel rods. Basically, someone would need to handle very radioactive material to obtain a small amount of neptunium.

Next would be the likelihood of fission when struck with a neutron. If it is the same or less than uranium, I would go with uranium. It would have to be substantially more than uranium to offset the cost of refinement.

Also, there is the energy output per gram. I don't think it would be much greater than uranium, probably less.

The isotopes of neptunium that have long half-lives are $\ce{{}^{236}Np}$ and $\ce{{}^{237}Np}$. These are not produced in great abundance from $\ce{{}^{235}U}$ or $\ce{{}^{238}U}$.

To make plutonium from uranium, the uranium must absorb neutrons without fission. This is much more likely to happen then to make $\ce{{}^{236}Np}$ or $\ce{{}^{237}Np}$

share|improve this answer
3  
>To make plutonium from uranium, the uranium must absorb an alpha particle. || Nope, $^{239}Pu$ is product of double beta decay of $^{239}U$, produced by neutron capture by $^{238}U$. Most transuranic elements are produced by neutron capture and beta-decay, though for heaviest ones that fails. –  permeakra Jul 7 at 5:58

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.